SOUTHERN ARIZONA LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
Election identification and administration
New identification and election procedures, with key implementation details still to be determined.
Secure elections need a workable plan.
Voters deserve secure, accessible elections and confidence that they will be run well. New requirements should come with clear instructions for implementation and a realistic understanding of the cost. We oppose this measure because it adds administrative complexity without adequately explaining how election officials are expected to comply.
Major Impacts
- ID for every election. Government-issued proof of identity would be required before casting a ballot, including by mail. The method of compliance would be prescribed by future legislators.
- More than an ID rule. The measure includes Election Day tabulation at the voting location and citizenship, foreign-contribution and election-law provisions.
- Implementation comes later. Requirements apply from January 1, 2028. The Legislature must fund implementation of the new requirements, but the text gives no dollar amount.
Would this change how I vote in 2026?
No. The requirements start in 2028. The text does not expressly abolish voting by mail.
SALC Recommends: VOTE NO on Proposition 144
Rejects these changes and leaves current requirements in place.
Common Questions
Would this end voting by mail?
The measure does not expressly end mail voting. It requires proof of identity regardless of voting method and leaves the process for meeting that requirement to future legislators.
Is this an unfunded mandate?
The measure requires the Legislature to fund implementation. SALC’s concern is that the cost and practical steps are not spelled out, even though the funding obligation is included.
What else is included?
The measure also addresses citizenship eligibility, foreign-national election contributions and expenditures, and the constitutional basis for election laws tied to legitimate state interests.
Does opposing this measure mean opposing election security?
No. SALC supports secure, accessible elections that are run well. Our concern is whether these new requirements come with a clear, workable plan for carrying them out.